<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Speed Rail News Roundup #28 &#8211; July 5, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.raileurope.com/8935-high-speed-rail-news-roundup-28-july-5-2012/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.raileurope.com/8935-high-speed-rail-news-roundup-28-july-5-2012</link>
	<description>Travel Tips &#38; Inspiration from Rail Europe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Hartshorne</title>
		<link>http://blog.raileurope.com/8935-high-speed-rail-news-roundup-28-july-5-2012#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Hartshorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raileurope.com/?p=8935#comment-7241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the trains would run from NYC through Hartford to Springfield and then continue to Holyoke, Northampton and Greenfield MA en route to Vermont cities like St Johnsbury and eventually, Montreal. THey will at first be commuter trains then later high speed if it catches on. Now they are spending big money creating a second set of tracks so they don&#039;t have to share them with freight trains.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the trains would run from NYC through Hartford to Springfield and then continue to Holyoke, Northampton and Greenfield MA en route to Vermont cities like St Johnsbury and eventually, Montreal. THey will at first be commuter trains then later high speed if it catches on. Now they are spending big money creating a second set of tracks so they don&#8217;t have to share them with freight trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.raileurope.com/8935-high-speed-rail-news-roundup-28-july-5-2012#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raileurope.com/?p=8935#comment-7240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see high speed rail connecting Chcago and New York via Toledo, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.  By this I mean real high speed rail at speeds over 200 mph, not the fake high speed rail that has been sold to the American public with trains that only go a little over 100 mph. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see high speed rail connecting Chcago and New York via Toledo, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.  By this I mean real high speed rail at speeds over 200 mph, not the fake high speed rail that has been sold to the American public with trains that only go a little over 100 mph. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
